Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing · New Jersey

Engineered Materials : Millville

Millville, NJ · ~33 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Engineered Materials : Millville runs at 93% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Engineered Materials : Millville: 3.1 TCR = 93% of Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Engineered Materials : Millville safety composite

Engineered Materials : Millville scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2017→2020

Engineered Materials : Millville injury rate improved

Engineered Materials : Millville's TCR fell 3.0 from 3.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.3 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.0 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339991 · Millville, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 93% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Sur-Seal - Main
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sur-Seal - Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Engineered Materials : Millville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Engineered Materials : Millville averages 3.1 TCR (93% of the Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Engineered Materials : Millville TCR series: 2017=3 · 2018=9.3 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Engineered Materials : Millville falls in its industry

218 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing D establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing D employers in New Jersey.

Engineered Materials : Millville (33 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Engineered Materials : Millville
Engineered Materials : Millville (33 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Engineered Materials : Millville has fewer employees than the Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 9.3 6.2 2 1 0
2017 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339991 · NJ · Millville

218 Gasket, Packing, and Sealing Device Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 49 employers in Millville, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sur-Seal - Main 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Gasket and Rubber Corp. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rhopac Fabricated Products 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nitto Denko Automotive Ohio Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ayr Wellness LLC - Woodbridge 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE South Jersey Gas: Cape May 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edison Office 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wade Ray & Associates Construction, Inc. 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Millville Shoprite 343 FTE
CITY-NEAR Groupe SEB USA - Millville 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIL 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2109 195 FTE
NAT-TCR Mission Trace MT 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Admin & Operations (Port Townsend) 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR REN093 SE Missouri 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lessors, Inc- Eagan 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Turner at AdvanSix Frankford PA 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : OAJ - Jacksonville NC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : GTF - Great Falls 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1855-WIMIL73 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.