Support Activities for Air Transportation · Minnesota

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis

Minneapolis, MN · ~1,222 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis runs at 118% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade C.

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis: 5.3 TCR = 118% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 5.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis held a steady TCR band

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis's TCR held near 0.3 from 4.4 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.4 · 2018=6.0 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 5.3 · 118% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #15/28
  • PHOTO 9215-CLT
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 263 inj
  • SIZE ~1,222 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 9215-CLT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis averages 5.3 TCR (118% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2018=6 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=4.7 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 28 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in Minnesota.

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis (1,222 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis
DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis (1,222 employees, TCR 5.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.7 4.3 46 2 0
2019 6.1 5.8 93 0 0
2018 6.0 5.6 75 0 0
2017 4.4 4.1 49 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · MN · Minneapolis

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 9215-CLT 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SAN063 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : MDT - Harrisburg 5.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR AGI SFO 5.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Honeywell Minneapolis MN 1,220 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9006-90060008 1,226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board 1,226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Association 1,216 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : MDT - Harrisburg 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Amarillo Substation Department 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Luckys 34 5.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sutherlands Home Base - Amarillo 5.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Multnomah County Bldg 167 / Lincoln Building 1,222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mercy Life Center Corporation 1,222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - CVG5 1,222 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia Memorial Palliative Care 1,221 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.