Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing · Minnesota

Honeywell Minneapolis MN

Minneapolis, MN · ~1,220 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Honeywell Minneapolis MN runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Honeywell Minneapolis MN: 0.6 TCR = 19% of Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Honeywell Minneapolis MN safety composite

Honeywell Minneapolis MN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 54% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Honeywell Minneapolis MN: 0.5 → 0.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 0.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.7× in 2017

Honeywell Minneapolis MN's TCR rose 0.4 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334511 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 19% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Rockwell Collins (Be…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~1,220 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rockwell Collins (Bellevue IA) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Honeywell Minneapolis MN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Honeywell Minneapolis MN averages 0.6 TCR (19% of the Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Honeywell Minneapolis MN TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Honeywell Minneapolis MN falls in its industry

388 Aeronautical systems and instr establishments

Safer than 54% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Aeronautical systems and instr employers in Minnesota.

Honeywell Minneapolis MN (1,220 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Honeywell Minneapolis MN
Honeywell Minneapolis MN (1,220 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 207 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Honeywell Minneapolis MN has more employees than the Aeronautical systems and instruments man median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.8 0.5 9 2 0
2016 0.5 0.1 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334511 · MN · Minneapolis

388 Aeronautical systems and instruments manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins (Bellevue IA) 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Bay FL 2400 Palm Bay Rd 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Space and Airborne Systems : NJ, Clifton - 77 River Rd. 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safran Electronics & Defense Avionics Redmond 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : MSP - Minneapolis 1,222 FTE
STATE-SIZE Association 1,216 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9006-90060008 1,226 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minneapolis Park & Recreation Board 1,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Coffeyville Resources 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR HBSHSEPR02 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Distribution and Services: ASI - Rapid City, SD 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Penske : 4779-00 East Coast Metals-DCC/Durham, NC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Amazon Transportation Services : LAX5 1,220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Midstate Medical Center 1,220 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Mary's Healthcare 1,220 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palmetto Goodwill 1,219 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.