Support Activities for Air Transportation · North Carolina

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham

Raleigh-Durham, NC · ~453 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham runs at 75% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Support Activities for Air Transportation workplace, earning a grade B.

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham: 3.4 TCR = 75% of Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham safety composite

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 66% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2017→2020

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham injury rate improved

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham's TCR fell 3.0 from 4.1 in 2017 to 1.1 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.1 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Raleigh-Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.4 · 75% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #22/52
  • PHOTO Jet Aviation Califor…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 61 inj
  • SIZE ~453 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Jet Aviation California, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham averages 3.4 TCR (75% of the Support Activities for Air Transportation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham TCR series: 2017=4.1 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.1 · BLS 4.5

Where DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham falls in its industry

1,555 Support Activities for Air Tra establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 52 Support Activities for Air Tra employers in North Carolina.

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham (453 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham
DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham (453 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham has more employees than the Support Activities for Air Transportatio median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.1 1.1 4 0 0
2019 2.2 1.7 7 1 0
2018 6.1 5.5 30 0 0
2017 4.1 2.3 20 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · NC · Raleigh-Durham

1,555 Support Activities for Air Transportation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 4 employers in Raleigh-Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Jet Aviation California, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Henderson Executive Airport 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4765-INDPW9669 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avports - Albany International Airport 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Halifax, NC 452 FTE
STATE-SIZE POLYWOOD North Carolina 452 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. 454 FTE
STATE-SIZE 177 AUT - WINSTON SALEM 454 FTE
CITY-NEAR RDU RDU 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-RDU 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR RDU - Airport United Airlines Offices 78 FTE
NAT-TCR REN180 Seattle 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR MS006 Hattiesburg, MS SPG 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Romulus NeuroSkills Center 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Burlington, VT Store 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2636-California.Offsite Bay Area 453 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ace Hardware Retail Support Center (Fredericksburg) 453 FTE
NAT-SIZE Load Trail - Sumner 453 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indian Springs Sch Dist 109 453 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.