Culture media manufacturing · North Carolina

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc.

Morrisville, NC · ~454 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Culture media manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc.: 1.4 TCR = 43% of Culture media manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. safety composite

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2019

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. injury rate improved

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 2.3 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.3 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.3 · 2017=1.0 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325414 · Morrisville, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO Miromatrix Medical
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~454 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miromatrix Medical (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. averages 1.4 TCR (43% of the Culture media manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. TCR series: 2016=2.3 · 2017=1 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=1 · BLS 3.3

Where FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. falls in its industry

234 Culture media manufacturing establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Culture media manufacturing employers in North Carolina.

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. (454 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc.
FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. (454 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 198 employees and a TCR of 1.2

FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. has more employees than the Culture media manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.0 0.6 5 0 0
2018 1.3 1.1 7 0 0
2017 1.0 0.6 5 0 0
2016 2.3 1.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325414 · NC · Morrisville

234 Culture media manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 219 employers in Morrisville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miromatrix Medical 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Zoetis - White Hall, IL 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Boehringer Ingelheim - Athens 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific Heights 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 177 AUT - WINSTON SALEM 454 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6836-GRE 455 FTE
STATE-SIZE DGS Aviation Services : RDU - Raleigh-Durham 453 FTE
STATE-SIZE Halifax, NC 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Development Drive 2,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC_Morrisville_4200 Paramount Pkwy_ECA42PAR 962 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lenovo - Think Place 794 FTE
CITY-NEAR Teleflex Morrisville 649 FTE
NAT-TCR FedEx Supply Chain - Fulfillment Greenwood 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ZSR Contracting and Restoration, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Farm 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0017 3189 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE GA0032C650 454 FTE
NAT-SIZE TN - Verizon 454 FTE
NAT-SIZE Master Lock Company LLC Milwaukee Facility 454 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jill Acquisition LLC - Tilton Operations Center 454 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.