Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Georgia

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield

Savannah, GA · ~22 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield runs at 94% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade C.

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield: 4.2 TCR = 94% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield safety composite

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield: 0.0 → 8.4 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield's TCR rose 8.4 from 0.0 in 2019 to 8.4 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Savannah, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 94% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/24
  • PHOTO ISP
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~22 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ISP (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield averages 4.2 TCR (94% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=8.4 · BLS 4.5

Where DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 24 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Georgia.

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield (22 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield
DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield (22 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DI - AFM East Hunter Army Airfield has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · GA · Savannah

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 511 employers in Savannah, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ISP 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Goodrich Corporation (Louisville) 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730010-MX 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR BDL-ITP 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Little Creek Ag LLC 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jason Farm 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE Algae Energy Inc 22 FTE
STATE-SIZE DIRT MOVERS 22 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gulfstream Aerospace 13,245 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical Center 3,186 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savannah College of Art and Design 2,369 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Health University Medical 2,056 FTE
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : CLT - Charlotte 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hand Center - Greenville 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 55806 Beaverton 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Sturdevant Companies - 52 Refinish Supply Center 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ashley Furniture Homestore- Castleton 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Furniture Homestore- Lexington 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Furniture Homestore- Prattville 22 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ashley Furniture Homestore- Jackson 22 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.