Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · California

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC

Barstow, CA · ~87 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC runs at 197% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade D.

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC: 8.9 TCR = 197% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC safety composite

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 17.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC: 0.0 → 17.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 17.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2× in 2020

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC's TCR rose 17.8 from 0.0 in 2019 to 17.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Barstow, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 8.9 · 197% of ind

  • DART 17.8 DART
  • RANK #107/120
  • PHOTO DBP GUS
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~87 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DBP GUS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DI - AFM West Barstow NTC averages 8.9 TCR (197% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=17.8 · BLS 4.5

Where DI - AFM West Barstow NTC falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #107 safest of 120 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in California.

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC (87 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DI - AFM West Barstow NTC
DI - AFM West Barstow NTC (87 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DI - AFM West Barstow NTC has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 17.8 17.8 10 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · CA · Barstow

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 34 employers in Barstow, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DBP GUS 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR BWI AIRPORT (MDBWI) 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 7762 - 1-MAIN 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FLL-ITP 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Martinelli Vineyard Management, Inc 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE farming 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE A. SAMBADO & SON INC 87 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agromillora California 87 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 295 1,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 492 1,200 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1879 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR UIC/RUC/MCC M62204/38019/019 329 FTE
NAT-TCR BCA 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 862 Overland Park, Ks 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR SSA Pacific Portland Bulk Terminal 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ABE/Allentown 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE NGC - Shippingport Plant 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lueken's Village Foods- South 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waupun Christian Home 87 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Outdoors Gear - Binghamton 87 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.