Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Texas

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth

Fort Worth, TX · ~17 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth runs at 48% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade A.

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth: 2.2 TCR = 48% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth safety composite

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth held a steady TCR band

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.6 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Fort Worth, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 48% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/101
  • PHOTO Lockheed Martin Corp…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~17 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lockheed Martin Corporation US AZ Yuma 151 O'Neill St (1250) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DI - Army CLS Ft Worth averages 2.2 TCR (48% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=8.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where DI - Army CLS Ft Worth falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 66% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 101 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Texas.

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth (17 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DI - Army CLS Ft Worth
DI - Army CLS Ft Worth (17 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DI - Army CLS Ft Worth has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 8.6 8.6 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · Fort Worth

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,346 employers in Fort Worth, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lockheed Martin Corporation US AZ Yuma 151 O'Neill St (1250) 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SFS 641MKC Kansas City 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MRK Aviation.com 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2073-SW-20730039-MX 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Soli Organic Inc. - Sherman 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moreman Gin 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quarterway Cotton Growers, LLC 17 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willamar Operating, L.P. 17 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US TX Fort Worth Lockheed Blvd (1093) 16,547 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Fort Worth Campus (1093) 13,805 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cook Children's Medical Center 4,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX- Fort Worth 4,667 FTE
NAT-TCR Medical Center of Boiling Spgs 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Automated Solutions LLC 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Florence Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 23 2.2 TCR

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.