Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · Texas

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso)

El Paso, TX · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade D.

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso): 7.8 TCR = 173% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) safety composite

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso): 2.9 → 12.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 12.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.81× in 2017

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso)'s TCR rose 9.8 from 2.9 in 2016 to 12.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.81× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · El Paso, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #86/101
  • PHOTO 1st Choice Aerospace
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1st Choice Aerospace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) averages 7.8 TCR (173% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) TCR series: 2016=2.9 · 2017=12.7 · BLS 4.5

Where DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 101 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in Texas.

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) (34 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso)
DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) (34 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DI - NASA AMOS (El Paso) has fewer employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 12.7 6.3 4 0 0
2016 2.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · TX · El Paso

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 974 employers in El Paso, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1st Choice Aerospace 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR SMF 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9215-KYSDF 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR G1 FACILITY SERVICES INC - EWR 100 BREWSTER RD 7.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE SOUTHWEST FEED YARD 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Tulia 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pineywoods 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE TXP 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR U.S. Border Patrol Sector - El Paso 2,330 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alegre Home Health Care, LLC EL PASO 1,942 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - El Paso 1,847 FTE
CITY-NEAR MVT Services, LLC 1,798 FTE
NAT-TCR Avon Location #02 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale La Crosse Memory Care 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Spectrum America 998 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oelwein Iowa 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glenn E. Sessions & Sons 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caliber, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1034 Southern York Co. School District 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.