Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) · California

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu

Pt Mugu, CA · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) workplace, earning a grade C.

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu: 3.9 TCR = 87% of Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu safety composite

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.49 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu: 0.0 → 11.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 11.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.4× in 2020

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu's TCR rose 11.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 11.0 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488190 · Pt Mugu, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 87% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #66/120
  • PHOTO LAS MX
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LAS MX (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu averages 3.9 TCR (87% of the Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=3.4 · 2020=11 · BLS 4.5

Where DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu falls in its industry

992 Aircraft maintenance and repai establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #66 safest of 120 Aircraft maintenance and repai employers in California.

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu (70 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu
DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu (70 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DI - Navy Test Wing Pacific - Point Mugu has more employees than the Aircraft maintenance and repair services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.0 5.5 7 1 0
2019 3.4 3.4 3 0 0
2018 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488190 · CA · Pt Mugu

992 Aircraft maintenance and repair services (except factory conversion, factory overhaul, factory rebuilding) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LAS MX 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Winston-Salem 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR HAECO Americas - GSO 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Signature Flight Support Sioux Falls 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heritage Land Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ceballos Ag Services, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRTHN 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE EW Merritt Farms 70 FTE
NAT-TCR Headquarters 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR FI - The Oaks, LLC 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Chemence Dalton 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Engineer/Public Works Admin/Parking 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ASPEN Smyrna 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boyer's Food Markets -Birdsboro 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Academy of Aerospace and Engineering (Elementary) 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE VA - Relocation Drive 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.