In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing · Michigan

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield

Southfield, MI · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield: 0.9 TCR = 28% of In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield safety composite

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield held a steady TCR band

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325413 · Southfield, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P69
  • PHOTO Becton Dickinson Car…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Becton Dickinson Caribe LTD (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=3 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield falls in its industry

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances establishments

Safer than 69% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield (36 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield
Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield (36 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 120 employees and a TCR of 1.4

Diagnostics : Beckman Coulter - Southfield has fewer employees than the In-vitro diagnostic substances manufactu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 3.0 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325413 · MI · Southfield

201 In-vitro diagnostic substances manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 175 employers in Southfield, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Becton Dickinson Caribe LTD 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Abcam Waltham 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SomaLogic - 2950 Wilderness Place 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Access Bio, Inc 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE R & R ASPHALT INC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Water Energy Center 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Facilities 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Grand Haven Office 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIDET210 ASCENSION PROVIDENCE HOSP - SOUTHFIELD 2,128 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-MIDET210 2,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barton Malow Holdings, LLC 1,959 FTE
CITY-NEAR DENSO International America, inc. 1,503 FTE
NAT-TCR Fairfield Buffalo 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilton Orlando 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Calvert City Lumber Co. 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sintergy 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ellet Neon Sales & Service Inc 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Prestressed 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Florida 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homewood Holyoke 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.