Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area · Michigan

Diamond Asphalt

Midland, MI · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diamond Asphalt runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area workplace, earning a grade F.

Diamond Asphalt: 7.0 TCR = 249% of Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diamond Asphalt safety composite

Diamond Asphalt scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

43/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.0

2016→2024

Diamond Asphalt injury rate improved

Diamond Asphalt's TCR fell 7.0 from 9.6 in 2016 to 2.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 30.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.6 · 2017=30.2 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Midland, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.0 · 249% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #23/30
  • PHOTO Ayala Boring Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ayala Boring Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Diamond Asphalt in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diamond Asphalt averages 7.0 TCR (249% of the Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diamond Asphalt TCR series: 2016=9.6 · 2017=30.2 · 2018=6.6 · 2019=3.2 · 2020=3.4 · 2021=7.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.6 · BLS 2.8

Where Diamond Asphalt falls in its industry

1,634 Asphalting, residential and co establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 30 Asphalting, residential and co employers in Michigan.

Diamond Asphalt (33 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Diamond Asphalt
Diamond Asphalt (33 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Diamond Asphalt has fewer employees than the Asphalting, residential and commercial d median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.6 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 7.2 7.2 2 0 0
2020 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2019 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2018 6.6 0.0 1 1 0
2017 30.2 20.1 8 1 0
2016 9.6 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · MI · Midland

1,634 Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 135 employers in Midland, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ayala Boring Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burton Construction LLC 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Norcal Pool Construction Inc DBA South Bay Gunite 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Onalaska, WI 6.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE PRH GROUP LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Three Rivers Svc Ctr 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alpena Power Company 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water Treatment City of Wyoming 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michigan Operations - Midland 3,755 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dow Chemical - Great Lakes Bay Region Corporate Facilities 3,454 FTE
CITY-NEAR MyMichigan Medical Center Midland 2,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR MidMichigan Medical Center - Midland 2,348 FTE
NAT-TCR Aurora (16) 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Harlan Bakeries Colorado 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR IronTiger - Dublin 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Fitch Creations, Inc. 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Peerless Farms LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GHK Truss, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thybar Corporation 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Block Graphics -2 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.