Curtain wall, glass, installation · Georgia

Diamond Glass Company, Inc.

Alpharetta, GA · ~43 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. runs at 120% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Curtain wall, glass, installation workplace, earning a grade D.

Diamond Glass Company, Inc.: 3.4 TCR = 120% of Curtain wall, glass, installation BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. safety composite

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Diamond Glass Company, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238150 · Alpharetta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 120% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/15
  • PHOTO Enclos - Capital One…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Enclos - Capital One Block B (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diamond Glass Company, Inc. averages 3.4 TCR (120% of the Curtain wall, glass, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=2.1 · 2020=6.6 · 2021=1.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Diamond Glass Company, Inc. falls in its industry

531 Curtain wall, glass, installat establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 15 Curtain wall, glass, installat employers in Georgia.

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Diamond Glass Company, Inc.
Diamond Glass Company, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Diamond Glass Company, Inc. has more employees than the Curtain wall, glass, installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 12.3 12.3 5 0 0
2022 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2020 6.6 6.6 3 0 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238150 · GA · Alpharetta

531 Curtain wall, glass, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Enclos - Capital One Block B 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enclos - MSK NY 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chicago Field Office 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champion Metal & Glass, Inc. 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vickers Farms 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stephens County Hatchery 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE B.C.T. Gin Co.,Inc. 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Plant McIntosh (Steam) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR BelGioioso Cheese - New Denmark 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Alabama Mental Health 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Orthopaedic Surgery Center at Bryn Mawr Hospital 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Iconic Marine Group, LLC 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE McFarland and Company, Inc., Publishers 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE RJK Transportation Inc 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Builder Services Network 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thorneburg Hosiery 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.