Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) · Texas

Diana Hoover

Galveston, TX · ~33 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Diana Hoover runs at 43% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) workplace, earning a grade A.

Diana Hoover: 0.8 TCR = 43% of Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) BLS 1.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Diana Hoover safety composite

Diana Hoover scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Diana Hoover injury rate improved

Diana Hoover's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 211111 · Galveston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 43% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #46/78
  • PHOTO ConocoPhillips Alask…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ConocoPhillips Alaska - Kuparuk (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Diana Hoover in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Diana Hoover averages 0.8 TCR (43% of the Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Diana Hoover TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=6.2 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.9

Where Diana Hoover falls in its industry

225 Petroleum, crude, production ( establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #46 safest of 78 Petroleum, crude, production ( employers in Texas.

Diana Hoover (33 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 01234 Average employees Total Case Rate Diana Hoover
Diana Hoover (33 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 150 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Diana Hoover has fewer employees than the Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.2 6.2 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

211111 · TX · Galveston

225 Petroleum, crude, production (i.e., extraction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 76 employers in Galveston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ConocoPhillips Alaska - Kuparuk 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Resources - Watford City, ND 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Venado Oil and Gas LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hilcorp L48 E 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE SW Seed Company New Deal 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Houston 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tejas Feeders LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrims LIVE OPERATIONS 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Galveston Office 991 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schlitterbahn Waterparks - Galveston 684 FTE
CITY-NEAR G&H Towing Company 502 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Luis Hotel 446 FTE
NAT-TCR Elkton, VA Facility 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Luxium Solutions - Hiram 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor's Industrial Coatings, Incorporated - Branch 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Dynalab FF Inc 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Powell's Books -- Hawthorne 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Canton Floors Inc 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Para Tech Coating - 60-3 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlantic Tire - Store 24 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.