Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) · California

Dimo Gigi Logistics

San Diego, CA · ~73 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dimo Gigi Logistics runs at 112% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) workplace, earning a grade C.

Dimo Gigi Logistics: 7.3 TCR = 112% of Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS 6.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dimo Gigi Logistics safety composite

Dimo Gigi Logistics scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 7.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
F 14 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Dimo Gigi Logistics: 0.0 → 15.4 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.93× in 2024

Dimo Gigi Logistics's TCR rose 15.4 from 0.0 in 2022 to 15.4 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492110 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 7.3 · 112% of ind

  • DART 14.0 DART
  • RANK #210/710
  • PHOTO ORHRM - HERMISTON CE…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ORHRM - HERMISTON CENTER (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Dimo Gigi Logistics in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dimo Gigi Logistics averages 7.3 TCR (112% of the Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dimo Gigi Logistics TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=15.4 · BLS 6.5

Where Dimo Gigi Logistics falls in its industry

6,679 Air courier services (except e establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 8.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #210 safest of 710 Air courier services (except e employers in California.

Dimo Gigi Logistics (73 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Dimo Gigi Logistics
Dimo Gigi Logistics (73 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 8.0

Dimo Gigi Logistics has fewer employees than the Air courier services (except establishme median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 8.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.4 14.0 11 0 0
2023 6.4 6.4 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492110 · CA · San Diego

6,679 Air courier services (except establishments operating under a universal service obligation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ORHRM - HERMISTON CENTER 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR OHSAN - SANDUSKY 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lovern Logistics : Lovern Logistics 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Di Mare and Co. Logistics, Inc 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Columbia 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms Inc/Palomate Inc 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Scepter Inc - Bicknell Operations 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage-6, LLC 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Virginia Hospital Center 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Capitol Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE 403006-Epsom | NH | EPS-000 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE POB 2055 Kimball Ave 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE IBP of San Antonio 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hurst Construction and Fabrication, LLC 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.