Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing · Minnesota

Distribution Center

Mankato, MN · ~312 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Distribution Center runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Distribution Center: 6.2 TCR = 188% of Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Distribution Center safety composite

Distribution Center scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.6

2017→2023

Distribution Center injury rate improved

Distribution Center's TCR fell 7.6 from 9.7 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 9.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.7 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 339920 · Mankato, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 188% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #8/11
  • PHOTO Tulsa SCIFIT
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 86 inj
  • SIZE ~312 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tulsa SCIFIT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Distribution Center averages 6.2 TCR (188% of the Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Distribution Center TCR series: 2017=9.7 · 2018=5.2 · 2019=5.4 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.8 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Distribution Center falls in its industry

197 Sporting goods (except ammunit establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 11 Sporting goods (except ammunit employers in Minnesota.

Distribution Center (312 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Distribution Center
Distribution Center (312 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 84 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Distribution Center has more employees than the Sporting goods (except ammunition, cloth median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.0 1.3 7 1 0
2022 3.6 1.6 8 3 0
2021 7.8 7.1 15 9 0
2020 9.8 7.6 21 6 0
2019 5.4 4.2 11 2 0
2018 5.2 4.7 9 2 0
2017 9.7 8.2 15 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

339920 · MN · Mankato

197 Sporting goods (except ammunition, clothing, footwear, small arms) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 214 employers in Mankato, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tulsa SCIFIT 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR ETC/181 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Halcyon Manufacturing Inc 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR SCIFIT Tulsa 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corporate Graphics Commercial - MN - 0027 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0372 - COON RAPIDS MN WHSE 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE Preferred Staffing - Roseville 312 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mille Lacs Health System - Hospital 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State University, Mankato 2,729 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Mankato 2,468 FTE
CITY-NEAR MRCI - Premier Drive 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mankato Area Public Schools 1,200 FTE
NAT-TCR Tourtellot 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR International Nutrition 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR RGJ, Inc. 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pilgrim Rehab & Skilled Nursing 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE LaJoy Group, Sterling Heights 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crane 1 Services 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Benson's Bakery 312 FTE
NAT-SIZE Richard E. Pierson Construction Co, Inc. 312 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.