Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Texas

Distribution Services- Air Force

Austin, TX · ~60 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Distribution Services- Air Force runs at 162% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade D.

Distribution Services- Air Force: 9.4 TCR = 162% of Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Distribution Services- Air Force safety composite

Distribution Services- Air Force scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2017

Distribution Services- Air Force injury rate improved

Distribution Services- Air Force's TCR fell 3.0 from 10.8 in 2016 to 7.9 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 10.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.8 · 2017=7.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.4 · 162% of ind

  • DART 7.9 DART
  • RANK #68/76
  • PHOTO RIL/ATT Kenner
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RIL/ATT Kenner (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Distribution Services- Air Force in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Distribution Services- Air Force averages 9.4 TCR (162% of the Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Distribution Services- Air Force TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2017=7.9 · BLS 5.8

Where Distribution Services- Air Force falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 76 Private warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

Distribution Services- Air Force (60 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Distribution Services- Air Force
Distribution Services- Air Force (60 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Distribution Services- Air Force has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 7.9 7.9 5 0 0
2016 10.8 10.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · TX · Austin

453 Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RIL/ATT Kenner 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA - 21024 24th 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Georgia Kaolin Terminals 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR RLSC Laundry 9.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frontier Feedlot Dublin LLC 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Waelder 1 Complex 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACRT, Inc. Arlington TX 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE VES Survey International 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Caledonia Township 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TriMet Powell Operations 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR KLC 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR US VA Chantilly Lee Road 3384 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vienna Nursing and Rehab LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Dexter Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Charleston LLC 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Office 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.