Public probation offices · Virginia

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas)

Manassas, VA · ~42 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Public probation offices workplace, earning a grade B.

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas): 2.5 TCR = 77% of Public probation offices BLS 3.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) safety composite

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2017→2019

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) injury rate improved

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas)'s TCR fell 2.6 from 5.0 in 2017 to 2.4 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922150 · Manassas, VA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/7
  • PHOTO Michigan Department …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Parole (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Public probation offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) TCR series: 2017=5 · 2018=0 · 2019=2.4 · BLS 3.2

Where District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) falls in its industry

81 Public probation offices establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 7 Public probation offices employers in Virginia.

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) (42 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas)
District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) (42 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.4

District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) has fewer employees than the Public probation offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.0 2.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922150 · VA · Manassas

81 Public probation offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 278 employers in Manassas, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Parole 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPSCS Operations Central Home Detention Unit 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michigan Department of Corrections - Eastern District Probation 2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Probation 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bickford of Chesterfield 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE LifeCare Ambulance Service, Inc. 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE WAWA SITE - 8652 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cplace MC Botetourt, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Micron INC. Manassas, VA 1,617 FTE
CITY-NEAR Micron Technology Virginia 1,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Manassas City Public Schools 1,342 FTE
CITY-NEAR Checks and Balances, Inc. 1,316 FTE
NAT-TCR WTLYN 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer inc - store 56 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Dakota Coop 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Madico - St. Pete 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE RIL Do it Best Sikeston 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE 510 - Dump - Turnersville 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE NDX Saber 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE OCH Christian County Clinic 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.