Industry profile · NAICS 922150

Rehabilitation services, correctional, government

Workplace injury rates across 91 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

91
Employers
4.3
Avg TCR
3.2
BLS benchmark
2,694
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Rehabilitation services, correctional, government average 4.3 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.3 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.2.

4.3
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.2
BLS national benchmark
91
employers reporting
2,694
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Rehabilitation services, correctional, government Safety Data Reveals

The Rehabilitation services, correctional, government sector (NAICS 922150) encompasses 91 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,694 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 4.3 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.2 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 4.3 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Rehabilitation services, correctional, government that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 2
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Walnut CHICAGO, IL F 20.2
OCSD Court Operations SANTA ANA, CA F 14.3
Probation Youth Leadership Academy ORANGE, CA F 14.2
Probation SAN BERNARDINO, CA F 11.6
Probation SAN DIEGO, CA F 11.0
New Haven District Office NEW HAVEN, CT F 10.9
San Joaquin County Probation STOCKTON, CA F 9.9
Probation Department AUBURN, CA F 8.4
Maricopa County - Juvenile Probation (270) PHOENIX, AZ F 8.4
Jail GLENCOE, MN F 8.1
Ventura County Probation Agency VENTURA, CA F 8.1
Waterbury District Office WATERBURY, CT F 8.0
Probation Juvenile Hall ORANGE, CA F 8.0
Probation Elec Mntr Ctr VISALIA, CA F 8.0
Probation Cntr St. VISALIA, CA F 7.5
Probation Noble VISALIA, CA F 6.8
Honorable George N. Leighton Criminal Courthouse CHICAGO, IL F 6.7
DOCCR-Client and Community Restoration MINNEAPOLIS, MN D 6.3
Adult Detention Center PRINCE WILLIAM, VA D 5.9
Juvenile Court Services SIERRA VISTA, AZ D 5.6
Michigan Department of Corrections - Chrysler District Probation DETROIT, MI D 5.6
Kingman Probation KINGMAN, AZ D 5.5
Nevada County Probation and Public Defender NEVADA CITY, CA D 5.1
Probation OROVILLE, CA D 5.1
Dillwyn Correctional Center DILLWYN, VA D 4.9
DOCCR-Community Offender Management MINNEAPOLIS, MN D 4.7
Probation Youth Guidance Center SANTA ANA, CA D 4.6
Coconino County Establishment 35 - Adult Probation Flagstaff, AZ FLAGSTAFF, AZ D 4.6
Operations Maryland Correctional Transportation Unit BALTIMORE, MD D 4.5
Adult Probation BISBEE, AZ D 4.5
Hartford District Office HARTFORD, CT D 4.4
Michigan Department of Corrections - Lawton Place Parole DETROIT, MI D 4.3
Scott County Juvenile Alternative Facility JORDAN, MN D 4.0
Michigan Department of Corrections - Monroe County Parole/Probation MONROE, MI D 4.0
Multnomah County Bldg 161 / Mead Building PORTLAND, OR C 3.8
Probation Department SONORA, CA C 3.7
Community Justice BEND, OR C 3.6
Community Corrections KLAMATH FALLS, OR C 3.6
FCI Milan MILAN, MI C 3.4
Michigan Department of Corrections - Lahser District Probation DETROIT, MI C 3.4
Michigan Department of Corrections - Greenfield District Probation DETROIT, MI C 3.4
Coconino County Establishment 32 - Juvenile Probation FLAGSTAFF, AZ C 3.3
Cook County Juvenile Probation /Markham MARKHAM, IL C 3.2
Juvenile Temporary Detention Center/Courthouse CHICAGO, IL C 3.0
Probation West County Field Services Office WESTMINSTER, CA C 2.8
Michigan Department of Corrections - Lincoln Park Parole LINCOLN PARK, MI C 2.8
Probation Admin Courthouse VISALIA, CA C 2.8
DPSCS Operations Central Home Detention Unit BALTIMORE, MD C 2.6
District 35 Probation and Parole (Manassas) MANASSAS, VA B 2.5
Michigan Department of Corrections - Pontiac Parole PONTIAC, MI B 2.4
Page 1 of 2 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Rehabilitation services, correctional, government?

This sector averages 4.3 against a BLS benchmark of 3.2 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.