Adult and Child residential corporate foster care · Minnesota

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton

Ortonville, MN · ~42 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Adult and Child residential corporate foster care workplace, earning a grade A.

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton: 1.4 TCR = 37% of Adult and Child residential corporate foster care BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton safety composite

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton: 0.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 3.5 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton's TCR rose 3.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 3.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624120 · Ortonville, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 37% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/44
  • PHOTO A Bright Future, Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: A Bright Future, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton averages 1.4 TCR (37% of the Adult and Child residential corporate foster care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=3.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton falls in its industry

1,320 Adult and Child residential co establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 44 Adult and Child residential co employers in Minnesota.

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton (42 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton
Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton (42 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Divine House Inc. - Ortonville & Clinton has fewer employees than the Adult and Child residential corporate fo median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624120 · MN · Ortonville

1,320 Adult and Child residential corporate foster care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 9 employers in Ortonville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR A Bright Future, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Options Tucson AZ 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Forte Residential, Inc. 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CareGivers America LLC Plains 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Michael Foods Inc.- GY2 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Redwood Falls, MN-PS 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Willmar Municipal Utilities 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Benson Power, LLC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ortonville Area Health Services 157 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ortonville Area Health Service 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ortonville Public School District 121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairway View Neighborhoods 105 FTE
NAT-TCR Sustainable Technologies 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 4795-PS-PNS-PENSACOLA-PNS-PSAA 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AHF, LLC West Plains Facility 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Short Mountain Orchard Contractors, LLC 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE CE Printed Products IL 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Paramold 90 Bourne 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG1060 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Complete Truck Bodies Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.