Water control and quality program administration · California

Division of Human Resources

Sacramento, CA · ~92 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Division of Human Resources runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Water control and quality program administration workplace, earning a grade B.

Division of Human Resources: 2.5 TCR = 78% of Water control and quality program administration BLS 3.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Division of Human Resources safety composite

Division of Human Resources scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2021→2024

Division of Human Resources injury rate improved

Division of Human Resources's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.8 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Sacramento, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/56
  • PHOTO OCPW Environmental R…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~92 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OCPW Environmental Resources (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Division of Human Resources in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Division of Human Resources averages 2.5 TCR (78% of the Water control and quality program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Division of Human Resources TCR series: 2021=1.8 · 2022=8.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Division of Human Resources falls in its industry

131 Water control and quality prog establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 56 Water control and quality prog employers in California.

Division of Human Resources (92 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Division of Human Resources
Division of Human Resources (92 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Division of Human Resources has fewer employees than the Water control and quality program admini median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.3 8.3 0 5 0
2021 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · CA · Sacramento

131 Water control and quality program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,348 employers in Sacramento, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OCPW Environmental Resources 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Town of Clayton -Water Resources 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Walla Walla 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WPCA 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nunez Ag, Inc. 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Vineyard Management, Inc. 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Terra Bella Nursery 92 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glass House Group Inc. 92 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Davis Health 10,481 FTE
CITY-NEAR Employment Development Department 8,494 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 451 5,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 485 5,500 FTE
NAT-TCR Warren County Sheltered Workshop 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Herlihy Mid-Continent Co. 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Milan-Deere Returns 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Agricultural Commodities Inc 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Niagara Bottling, LLC - Columbus 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE City Hall 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Track Gulf Shores 92 FTE
NAT-SIZE Moncks Corner Elementary formally Berkeley Intermediate School 92 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.