Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing · North Carolina

Dixon Quick Coupling

Dallas, NC · ~136 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dixon Quick Coupling runs at 245% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Dixon Quick Coupling: 8.1 TCR = 245% of Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dixon Quick Coupling safety composite

Dixon Quick Coupling scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.1

2017→2024

Dixon Quick Coupling injury rate improved

Dixon Quick Coupling's TCR fell 9.1 from 11.4 in 2017 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.4 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=11.7 · 2024=2.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332912 · Dallas, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.1 · 245% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Olivet - Plant 2
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 70 inj
  • SIZE ~136 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Olivet - Plant 2 (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Dixon Quick Coupling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dixon Quick Coupling averages 8.1 TCR (245% of the Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dixon Quick Coupling TCR series: 2017=11.4 · 2018=12.3 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=6.7 · 2022=9.3 · 2023=11.7 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Dixon Quick Coupling falls in its industry

182 Hose couplings and fittings, f establishments

Safer than 5% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Hose couplings and fittings, f employers in North Carolina.

Dixon Quick Coupling (136 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dixon Quick Coupling
Dixon Quick Coupling (136 employees, TCR 8.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 88 employees and a TCR of 2.1

Dixon Quick Coupling has more employees than the Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.5 3 0 0
2023 11.7 9.5 16 0 0
2022 9.3 9.3 9 2 0
2021 6.7 5.7 7 0 0
2020 6.2 4.1 5 1 0
2019 4.8 3.2 6 0 0
2018 12.3 9.2 13 3 0
2017 11.4 6.5 11 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332912 · NC · Dallas

182 Hose couplings and fittings, fluid power, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 22 employers in Dallas, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Olivet - Plant 2 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Manufacturer of Precision Machined Components to Customer Specification 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamilton 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piper Industries, Inc. 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Union Power Cooperative 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saputo Cheese USA, Inc. 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE NC316 Mt. Holly NC 136 FTE
STATE-SIZE UFP Mid-Atlantic, LLC 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston College 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 146 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Innovative Glass of America, Inc. 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7004 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Tec Excavation, Inc 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Troy Laser & Fab 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Royal Care of Avon Park 8.1 TCR
NAT-TCR D6 Springfield West Yard 8.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Construction 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE K98 AER - El Cajon 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miami 049 136 FTE
NAT-SIZE SSI Tacoma 136 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.