Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass · North Carolina

Innovative Glass of America, Inc.

Dallas, NC · ~132 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. runs at 531% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass workplace, earning a grade F.

Innovative Glass of America, Inc.: 17.5 TCR = 531% of Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. safety composite

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.3

2016→2019

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. injury rate improved

Innovative Glass of America, Inc.'s TCR fell 15.3 from 25.4 in 2016 to 10.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 25.4 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=25.4 · 2018=17.1 · 2019=10.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327215 · Dallas, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 17.5 · 531% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #17/17
  • PHOTO ACE Glass Manufactur…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ACE Glass Manufacturing, LLC - LR (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Innovative Glass of America, Inc. averages 17.5 TCR (531% of the Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. TCR series: 2016=25.4 · 2018=17.1 · 2019=10 · BLS 3.3

Where Innovative Glass of America, Inc. falls in its industry

441 Insulating glass, sealed units establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 17 Insulating glass, sealed units employers in North Carolina.

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. (132 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Innovative Glass of America, Inc.
Innovative Glass of America, Inc. (132 employees, TCR 17.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 94 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Innovative Glass of America, Inc. has more employees than the Insulating glass, sealed units, made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 10.0 2.9 14 0 0
2018 17.1 8.6 22 0 0
2016 25.4 12.3 35 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327215 · NC · Dallas

441 Insulating glass, sealed units, made from purchased glass employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 22 employers in Dallas, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ACE Glass Manufacturing, LLC - LR 17.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 69_78 18.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Glass Fabricator 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gilded Mirrors Inc. 16.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Charlotte, NC Office 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE US150: Charlotte 260 - SG 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lenoir Site 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iron Horse Contractors 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gaston College 760 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 146 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dixon Quick Coupling 136 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 7004 126 FTE
NAT-TCR Home2 Suites by Hilton 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Conwaste Recogido Desperdicios Solidos Fajardo 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Two Rivers Terminal Moses Lake 17.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbia Healthcare Center 17.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 6962-Swy 0025 3125 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-Swy 0005 1975 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-Swy 0019 0412 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6400-Swy 0019 0386 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.