Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction · Alabama

D&J Enterprises

Auburn, AL · ~154 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

D&J Enterprises runs at 68% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction workplace, earning a grade B.

D&J Enterprises: 1.9 TCR = 68% of Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS 2.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

D&J Enterprises safety composite

D&J Enterprises scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 68% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

D&J Enterprises: 1.0 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2024

D&J Enterprises's TCR rose 1.2 from 1.0 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237310 · Auburn, AL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 68% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #23/51
  • PHOTO Remac, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Remac, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

D&J Enterprises in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows D&J Enterprises averages 1.9 TCR (68% of the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

D&J Enterprises TCR series: 2016=1 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=1.8 · 2019=1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=4 · 2024=2.3 · BLS 2.8

Where D&J Enterprises falls in its industry

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, stree establishments

Safer than 68% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 51 Pavement, highway, road, stree employers in Alabama.

D&J Enterprises (154 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate D&J Enterprises
D&J Enterprises (154 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 3.0

D&J Enterprises has more employees than the Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.3 1.1 4 0 0
2023 4.0 2.9 7 0 1
2022 2.7 2.7 5 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 4 0 0
2020 0.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.0 0.5 2 0 0
2018 1.8 1.4 4 0 0
2017 1.5 0.5 3 0 0
2016 1.0 1.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237310 · AL · Auburn

4,078 Pavement, highway, road, street, bridge or airport runway, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 113 employers in Auburn, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Remac, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Calportland Construction - Construction Division 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fay Southeast, S&B USA Construction 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Infrastructure Group 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE RJ Mechanical Inc. 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE R.L.Zeigler Co., Inc. 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vectorply Corporation 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Huntsville Manufacturing 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Briggs & Stratton 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4021-000017263 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000017263 AUBURN UNIVERSITY DINING 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 356 344 FTE
NAT-TCR T & S Construction Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bauer Foundation Corp. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Clark Public Utilities - Operations 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Calportland Construction - Construction Division 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE TRUMPF Inc - TUSD 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concrete Proection and Restoration, LLC 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Publick House 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milk Industry Management Co. d.b.a Balford Farms 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.