Fruit sorting, grading, and packing · California

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company

Newman, CA · ~70 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fruit sorting, grading, and packing workplace, earning a grade D.

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company: 7.8 TCR = 173% of Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company safety composite

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company: 3.0 → 11.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 13.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.47× in 2024

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company's TCR rose 8.4 from 3.0 in 2021 to 11.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 13.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Newman, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.8 · 173% of ind

  • DART 11.5 DART
  • RANK #172/236
  • PHOTO 2530-Redwood Falls, …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~70 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company averages 7.8 TCR (173% of the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company TCR series: 2021=3 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=13.2 · 2024=11.5 · BLS 4.5

Where DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company falls in its industry

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa establishments

Safer than 16% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #172 safest of 236 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa employers in California.

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company (70 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company
DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company (70 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

DMB Packing Corp. / The DiMare Company has fewer employees than the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.5 11.5 8 0 0
2023 13.2 7.5 7 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2021 3.0 3.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Newman

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 15 employers in Newman, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2530-Redwood Falls, MN-FND (Monsanto Co.) 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1883-Harrisburg, SD 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Family Tree Farms Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CDS 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heritage Land Company 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ceballos Ag Services, Inc. 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE NRTHN 70 FTE
STATE-SIZE EW Merritt Farms 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saputo Cheese USA Inc. 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saputo Cheese_Newman 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR San Luis Care Center 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nob Hill 601-Newman 62 FTE
NAT-TCR Fluid Mechanical, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Elmhurst Commons Assisted Living 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4 Rivers Electric Cooperative, Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Coleman Agricultural Services Inc 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fairbanks Transportation 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Residence Inn Kapolei 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Knight Electric, Inc. 70 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blevins Asphalt Construction. CO. Inc. 70 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.