General Government · Minnesota

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility

Minneapolis, MN · ~171 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility runs at 106% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical General Government workplace, earning a grade C.

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility: 3.4 TCR = 106% of General Government BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility safety composite

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility: 0.7 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 11.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.19× in 2024

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility's TCR rose 4.1 from 0.7 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.19× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 922140 · Minneapolis, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 106% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #6/32
  • PHOTO Tri-County Community…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tri-County Community Corrections (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility averages 3.4 TCR (106% of the General Government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.6 · 2020=0 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=6.4 · 2023=2.6 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.2

Where DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility falls in its industry

482 General Government establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 32 General Government employers in Minnesota.

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility (171 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility
DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility (171 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 240 employees and a TCR of 5.8

DOCCR-Adult Correctional Facility has fewer employees than the General Government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.0 5 2 0
2023 2.6 2.6 1 3 0
2022 6.4 5.8 4 6 0
2021 11.5 11.5 1 16 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

922140 · MN · Minneapolis

482 General Government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tri-County Community Corrections 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR RED ROCK CORRECTIONAL CENTER 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN Dept of Corrections - St. Cloud 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR State Farm Correctional Center 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE 19 Boswell 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Agropur-Le Sueur Cheese Company 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trex Commercial Products 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE BROOKLYN PARK MN - 3333 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Round Lake Area Park District 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Slater, Inc. 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bear Scaffold and Services 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Shop Rite of Washington 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westbrook Service Corp 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jefferson County Comprehensive Services, Inc. 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sioux City Fabrication Plant 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Group Five Management 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.