Hammer forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished · Massachusetts

Doncasters Storms Forge

Springfield, MA · ~32 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Doncasters Storms Forge runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hammer forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished workplace, earning a grade F.

Doncasters Storms Forge: 8.6 TCR = 259% of Hammer forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Doncasters Storms Forge safety composite

Doncasters Storms Forge scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2023

Doncasters Storms Forge injury rate improved

Doncasters Storms Forge's TCR fell 3.4 from 6.9 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=10.1 · 2022=18.8 · 2023=3.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332112 · Springfield, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.6 · 259% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO Weber Metals Inc.
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Weber Metals Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Doncasters Storms Forge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Doncasters Storms Forge averages 8.6 TCR (259% of the Hammer forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Doncasters Storms Forge TCR series: 2016=6.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=10.1 · 2022=18.8 · 2023=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Doncasters Storms Forge falls in its industry

65 Hammer forgings made from purc establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Hammer forgings made from purc employers in Massachusetts.

Doncasters Storms Forge (32 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Doncasters Storms Forge
Doncasters Storms Forge (32 employees, TCR 8.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 90 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Doncasters Storms Forge has fewer employees than the Hammer forgings made from purchased nonf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2022 18.8 15.1 5 0 0
2019 10.1 6.7 3 0 0
2018 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2016 6.9 6.9 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332112 · MA · Springfield

65 Hammer forgings made from purchased nonferrous metals, unfinished employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 215 employers in Springfield, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Weber Metals Inc. 8.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Consolidated Industries Inc. 8.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aluminum Precision Products Alton 8.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wright Tool 8.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 4769-704-WILLIAMS SONOMA 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring hill Farm Dairy Inc 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE MARSHFIELD_1371980 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Putnam 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMC - Baystate Medical Center 8,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMP - Baystate Medical Practices 1,977 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Tarp Redevelopment, LLC d/b/a MGM Springfield 1,867 FTE
CITY-NEAR BMF - Baystate Medical Practices 1,746 FTE
NAT-TCR Mechanovent Corporation / The New York Blower Company 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Waters of Oakdale 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale Mariana Butte 8.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bexar Concrete Works I, Ltd 8.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Foodland Markets #51 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Windham 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thermal Engineering of Arizona 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Country Willow, LTD. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.