Building, nonresidential (except miniwarehouse), rental or leasing · Maryland

Donohoe Real Estate Services

Bethesda, MD · ~50 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Donohoe Real Estate Services runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Building, nonresidential (except miniwarehouse), rental or leasing workplace, earning a grade A.

Donohoe Real Estate Services: 0.4 TCR = 26% of Building, nonresidential (except miniwarehouse), rental or leasing BLS 1.4 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Donohoe Real Estate Services safety composite

Donohoe Real Estate Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Donohoe Real Estate Services held a steady TCR band

Donohoe Real Estate Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · Bethesda, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO C. E. JOHN COMPANY INC
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: C. E. JOHN COMPANY INC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Donohoe Real Estate Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Donohoe Real Estate Services averages 0.4 TCR (26% of the Building, nonresidential (except miniwarehouse), rental or leasing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Donohoe Real Estate Services TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.4

Where Donohoe Real Estate Services falls in its industry

302 Building, nonresidential (exce establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Building, nonresidential (exce employers in Maryland.

Donohoe Real Estate Services (50 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Donohoe Real Estate Services
Donohoe Real Estate Services (50 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Donohoe Real Estate Services has more employees than the Building, nonresidential (except miniwar median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · MD · Bethesda

302 Building, nonresidential (except miniwarehouse), rental or leasing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bethesda, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR C. E. JOHN COMPANY INC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cardinal Health RegScience 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR BBL Management, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR WOODLAND PRIME 400 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Green Leaf Extracts LLC dba gLeaf 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bell Nursery - Burtonsville 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE MS - Annapolis Junction, MD - 1AJMD 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gilbane Building Company TPM 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vador Ventures Inc 5,569 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Construction Group LLC 2,313 FTE
NAT-TCR Omega Construction, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sugar Land Corporate Office 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Elite Gasfield Services 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ORBIS Troy 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Marion Plant 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lakefield Veterinary Group - 135 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Becho Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunstall Inc 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.