Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade · Mississippi

Double G Coatings Company L.P.

Jackson, MS · ~74 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Double G Coatings Company L.P. runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Double G Coatings Company L.P.: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Double G Coatings Company L.P. safety composite

Double G Coatings Company L.P. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Double G Coatings Company L.P.: 2.5 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.62× in 2023

Double G Coatings Company L.P.'s TCR rose 1.3 from 2.5 in 2018 to 3.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Jackson, MS AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #2/6
  • PHOTO Reynolds
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reynolds (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Double G Coatings Company L.P. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Double G Coatings Company L.P. averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Double G Coatings Company L.P. TCR series: 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2021=2.5 · 2022=1.4 · 2023=3.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Double G Coatings Company L.P. falls in its industry

646 Aluminum coating of metal prod establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Mississippi alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 6 Aluminum coating of metal prod employers in Mississippi.

Double G Coatings Company L.P. (74 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Double G Coatings Company L.P.
Double G Coatings Company L.P. (74 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Double G Coatings Company L.P. has more employees than the Aluminum coating of metal products for t median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.8 1.3 3 0 0
2022 1.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 2.5 2.5 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · MS · Jackson

646 Aluminum coating of metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 260 employers in Jackson, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reynolds 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ternium 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hale Performance Coatings 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE South St. Office 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Natchez Trace Electric Power Association 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alcorn County Electric Power Association 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Malouf Construction LLC 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Dominic Jackson Memorial Hospital 2,937 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mississippi Baptist Medical Center 2,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Memorial Hospital - Mississippi Baptist Medical Center 2,566 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSJAC - JACKSON 1,458 FTE
NAT-TCR PCC Airfoils LLC - Mentor Plant 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hadronics 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro-Tops Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1810 Calumet City, IL 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hilex Poly - North Vernon Recycle 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gpi - West Monroe La 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE dba Diversicare of Hutchinson.LP 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apricot Lane Farms 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.