Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade · Arizona

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street

Phoenix, AZ · ~163 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street safety composite

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2016→2020

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street injury rate improved

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street's TCR fell 2.7 from 4.2 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 4.2 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.2 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332812 · Phoenix, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Reynolds
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~163 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Reynolds (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street TCR series: 2016=4.2 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.1 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street falls in its industry

646 Etching metals and metal produ establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Etching metals and metal produ employers in Arizona.

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street (163 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street
QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street (163 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

QuantumClean-Phoenix Watkins Street has more employees than the Etching metals and metal products (excep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.5 1.0 3 0 0
2019 1.9 1.9 4 0 0
2018 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2017 1.6 1.1 3 0 0
2016 4.2 1.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332812 · AZ · Phoenix

646 Etching metals and metal products (except printing plates) for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 2,630 employers in Phoenix, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Reynolds 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Double G Coatings Company L.P. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ternium 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hale Performance Coatings 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Stotz Dairy 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE 188354 Ocotillo Modernization Project 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Joy Cone Flagstaff 163 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quietflex Manufacturing Company, L.P. 163 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maricopa County 15,504 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phoenix Children's Hospital 7,575 FTE
CITY-NEAR All Company 6,261 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030500 6,153 FTE
NAT-TCR Xanitos EVS at Children's Hospital of Wisconsin 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR DGS Aviation Services : ROC - Rochester NY 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Attentive Care, Inc. - Hicksville 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LNA 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE EHP-Fairport 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE AK Tube LLC - Columbus 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marine Acquisition US Inc 163 FTE
NAT-SIZE Asplundh-Region 039 163 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.