Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors · Minnesota

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc.

New London, MN · ~23 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.3
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. runs at 259% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc.: 7.3 TCR = 259% of Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. safety composite

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc.: 6.8 → 15.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 15.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc.'s TCR rose 8.4 from 6.8 in 2019 to 15.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238110 · New London, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.3 · 259% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #17/27
  • PHOTO Bay Area Concretes, …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bay Area Concretes, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. averages 7.3 TCR (259% of the Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. TCR series: 2019=6.8 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=10.1 · 2023=11.5 · 2024=15.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. falls in its industry

1,314 Foundation, building, poured c establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 27 Foundation, building, poured c employers in Minnesota.

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc.
Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. (23 employees, TCR 7.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 3.8

Double J Concrete and Masonry, Inc. has fewer employees than the Foundation, building, poured concrete, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.1 0.0 1 2 0
2023 11.5 0.0 2 0 0
2022 10.1 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 6.8 3.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238110 · MN · New London

1,314 Foundation, building, poured concrete, contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 16 employers in New London, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bay Area Concretes, Inc 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cougar Cutting, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Imac Construction Inc. 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Concrete & Construction 7.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Brooten 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Alpha Foods, LLP 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNHT-SEL-HIGHWAY 12' 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fergus Falls CSC 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR New London-Spicer Schools 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmer Bus Service of New London-Spicer, Inc. 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of New London 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prairie Woods Elementary 50 FTE
NAT-TCR DC2 Aberdeen 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Home Juice Company Memphis 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Milford Police Department 7.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McCurdy Mechanical Corporation 7.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hale Early Education Center 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE A & T Plumbing, Inc. 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenwood 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.