Hotels (except casino hotels) · New York

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City

New York, NY · ~340 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
43.4
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City runs at 1446% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City: 43.4 TCR = 1446% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City safety composite

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 43.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City: 43.4 → 1950.0 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1950.0 TCR · DART/TCR 6.15× in 2017

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City's TCR rose 1906.6 from 43.4 in 2016 to 1950.0 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 6.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 43.4 · 1446% of ind

  • DART 266.7 DART
  • RANK #403/403
  • PHOTO 218
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 244 inj
  • SIZE ~340 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 218 (13.6 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City averages 43.4 TCR (1446% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City TCR series: 2016=43.4 · 2017=1950 · BLS 3.0

Where Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #403 safest of 403 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in New York.

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City (340 employees, TCR 43.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 01020304050 Average employees Total Case Rate Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City
Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City (340 employees, TCR 43.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Doubletree by Hilton Metropolitan Hotel New York City has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 1950.0 266.7 110 7 0
2016 43.4 3.9 134 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · NY · New York

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 218 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyatt Regency La Jolla at Aventine 29.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1053 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 9277-165 RIVER RUN BASE AREA 29.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 1070 - REGO PARK NY WHSE 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kennedy Valve Company 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE Massena Hospital 340 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Phoenix Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 340 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EWR - Ground Ops 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Provo Center (Utore) 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Menlo Park (Camen) 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jet.com FC-6923 340 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazonas Administration 340 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.