Dimension lumber, softwood, made from logs or bolts · Oregon

Douglas County Forest Products

Roseburg, OR · ~154 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Douglas County Forest Products runs at 317% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Dimension lumber, softwood, made from logs or bolts workplace, earning a grade F.

Douglas County Forest Products: 10.4 TCR = 317% of Dimension lumber, softwood, made from logs or bolts BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Douglas County Forest Products safety composite

Douglas County Forest Products scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Douglas County Forest Products: 6.1 → 13.6 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 18.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.49× in 2023

Douglas County Forest Products's TCR rose 7.5 from 6.1 in 2016 to 13.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 18.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 10.4 · 317% of ind

  • DART 5.2 DART
  • RANK #52/71
  • PHOTO Nix Forest Industries
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nix Forest Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Douglas County Forest Products in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Douglas County Forest Products averages 10.4 TCR (317% of the Dimension lumber, softwood, made from logs or bolts BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Douglas County Forest Products TCR series: 2016=6.1 · 2017=6 · 2018=8.5 · 2022=18.1 · 2023=13.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Douglas County Forest Products falls in its industry

905 Dimension lumber, softwood, ma establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 71 Dimension lumber, softwood, ma employers in Oregon.

Douglas County Forest Products (154 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Douglas County Forest Products
Douglas County Forest Products (154 employees, TCR 10.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Douglas County Forest Products has more employees than the Dimension lumber, softwood, made from lo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 13.6 5.2 12 9 0
2022 18.1 4.5 17 15 0
2018 8.5 1.8 13 1 0
2017 6.0 0.6 8 2 0
2016 6.1 1.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · OR · Roseburg

905 Dimension lumber, softwood, made from logs or bolts employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nix Forest Industries 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stimson Lumber 10.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lumbra Hardwoods Inc. 10.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spearfish Forest Products, Inc. 10.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Intersect Power 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portland water Bureau Maintenance and Construction 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTM, Incorporated dba Knife River Materials Medford 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southland TCM PRN 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR North 40 Outfitters #2 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Corrugated Container 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Aurubis Buffalo, Inc. 10.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal Craft Ind 10.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Griffith Foods - Lithonia 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Location 16005 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE RJ Mechanical Inc. 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE 9095-ITO 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.