Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing · Oregon

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office

Hillsboro, OR · ~154 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office: 2.7 TCR = 82% of Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office safety composite

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office: 1.6 → 2.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 10.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.74× in 2024

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.6 in 2016 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333242 · Hillsboro, OR AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.7 · 82% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #13/15
  • PHOTO Lam Research Corp Ma…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~154 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Lam Research Corp Malta Field Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office averages 2.7 TCR (82% of the Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=4.6 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=10 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office falls in its industry

133 Semiconductor making machinery establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 15 Semiconductor making machinery employers in Oregon.

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office (154 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office
Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office (154 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 100 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Lam Research Corp Hillsboro Office has more employees than the Semiconductor making machinery manufactu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 2.0 7 0 0
2023 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2022 10.0 8.0 5 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2020 1.2 1.2 2 0 0
2018 4.6 0.0 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333242 · OR · Hillsboro

133 Semiconductor making machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 282 employers in Hillsboro, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Lam Research Corp Malta Field Office 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MKS Klamath Falls 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR MKS Boulder 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BTU International 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Intersect Power 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portland water Bureau Maintenance and Construction 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE LTM, Incorporated dba Knife River Materials Medford 154 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southland TCM PRN 154 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ronler Acres Campus 11,998 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jones Farm Campus 7,114 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aloha Campus 1,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorn Farm Campus 1,638 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #0016 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR J.D. Newman Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresh Food Manufacturing (M003) 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Transport Service 60025 Kingsport 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hunter's Creek Nursing and Rehab Center 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sysco Guest Supply LLC. (Corporate) 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #1217 154 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6537 154 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.