Waste management program administration · Oregon

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste

Roseburg, OR · ~32 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.3
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste runs at 509% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Waste management program administration workplace, earning a grade F.

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste: 16.3 TCR = 509% of Waste management program administration BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste safety composite

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2023→2024

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste injury rate improved

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste's TCR fell 8.6 from 20.6 in 2023 to 12.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 20.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=20.6 · 2024=12.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924110 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.3 · 509% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #5/5
  • PHOTO Waste Management (CO…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waste Management (CON-012) (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste averages 16.3 TCR (509% of the Waste management program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste TCR series: 2023=20.6 · 2024=12 · BLS 3.2

Where Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste falls in its industry

131 Waste management program admin establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 5 Waste management program admin employers in Oregon.

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste (32 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste
Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste (32 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 126 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Douglas County Public Works - Solid Waste has fewer employees than the Waste management program administration median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.0 4.0 3 0 0
2023 20.6 13.7 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924110 · OR · Roseburg

131 Waste management program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waste Management (CON-012) 16.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penas Disposal 17.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR City Of Sacramento-Solid Waste Division Roll-Up (150058) 14.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Water WPC 18.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE ASSOCIATED FRUIT CO. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Obersinner Farms, Inc. 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blaylock Inc. 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR Plenums Plus 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR IBR Logistics INC 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Advent Industries, LLC 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wind River Environmental - Bayville, NJ 16.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vantage Construction Corporation 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zotefoams Midwest 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gator Fort Myers 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tonkawa Foundry, Inc 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.