Bag opening, filling, and closing machines manufacturing · Minnesota

Douglas Machine Inc.

Alexandria, MN · ~750 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Douglas Machine Inc. runs at 47% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Bag opening, filling, and closing machines manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Douglas Machine Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 47% of Bag opening, filling, and closing machines manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Douglas Machine Inc. safety composite

Douglas Machine Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

Douglas Machine Inc. injury rate improved

Douglas Machine Inc.'s TCR fell 2.5 from 3.4 in 2017 to 0.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.4 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333993 · Alexandria, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 47% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #6/19
  • PHOTO BBS Automation Chica…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 87 inj
  • SIZE ~750 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BBS Automation Chicago, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Douglas Machine Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Douglas Machine Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (47% of the Bag opening, filling, and closing machines manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Douglas Machine Inc. TCR series: 2017=3.4 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1 · 2020=1.2 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=1.2 · 2024=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Douglas Machine Inc. falls in its industry

269 Bag opening, filling, and clos establishments

Safer than 73% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 19 Bag opening, filling, and clos employers in Minnesota.

Douglas Machine Inc. (750 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Douglas Machine Inc.
Douglas Machine Inc. (750 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Douglas Machine Inc. has more employees than the Bag opening, filling, and closing machin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.9 0.3 7 0 0
2023 1.2 0.8 9 0 0
2022 1.2 0.1 9 0 0
2021 1.4 0.0 11 0 0
2020 1.2 0.4 9 0 0
2019 1.0 0.7 7 0 0
2018 2.2 1.9 14 1 0
2017 3.4 1.8 21 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333993 · MN · Alexandria

269 Bag opening, filling, and closing machines manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 86 employers in Alexandria, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BBS Automation Chicago, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR IDT MN- Loftton Label 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elmar Industries Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Moba Americas Inc 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE U of M Masonic Children's Hosp 750 FTE
STATE-SIZE State of MN Board of Public Defense 750 FTE
STATE-SIZE 9407 - Target.com Woodbury MN TFC 749 FTE
STATE-SIZE Imagine Print Solutions 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Douglas County Hospital DBA Alomere Health 923 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Extrusion Company 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria Technical and Community College 385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alexandria 378 FTE
NAT-TCR Henderson NV Locomotive 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ICP Medical, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Reimers Electra Steam, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Asphalt Materials INC - Lyons 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US FL Clearwater Tampa Rd (1376) 750 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cafe Valley 750 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stella Maris Inc. 750 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rockcastle Regional Hospital & Respiratory Care 750 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.