Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Minnesota

Imagine Print Solutions

Shakopee, MN · ~748 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Imagine Print Solutions runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade D.

Imagine Print Solutions: 4.0 TCR = 121% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Imagine Print Solutions safety composite

Imagine Print Solutions scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2017→2019

Imagine Print Solutions injury rate improved

Imagine Print Solutions's TCR fell 2.9 from 4.6 in 2017 to 1.7 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.7 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.6 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Shakopee, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 121% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #75/121
  • PHOTO Circle Graphics - Ra…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 91 inj
  • SIZE ~748 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Circle Graphics - Raleigh (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Imagine Print Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Imagine Print Solutions averages 4.0 TCR (121% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Imagine Print Solutions TCR series: 2017=4.6 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=1.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Imagine Print Solutions falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #75 safest of 121 Offset printing (except books, employers in Minnesota.

Imagine Print Solutions (748 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Imagine Print Solutions
Imagine Print Solutions (748 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Imagine Print Solutions has more employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 1.7 1.0 17 0 0
2018 5.7 3.6 39 0 0
2017 4.6 3.7 35 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MN · Shakopee

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 180 employers in Shakopee, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Circle Graphics - Raleigh 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MPS Greensboro 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Graphics South - 0077-FLMA1 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stuart Plant 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE 9407 - Target.com Woodbury MN TFC 749 FTE
STATE-SIZE Douglas Machine Inc. 750 FTE
STATE-SIZE U of M Masonic Children's Hosp 750 FTE
STATE-SIZE State of MN Board of Public Defense 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MSP1 2,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MSP1 2,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR Entrust Corporation 1,448 FTE
CITY-NEAR Emerson Automation Solutions - Shakopee 1,350 FTE
NAT-TCR Circle Graphics - Raleigh 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SD,SIOUX FALLS - Medical Center Campus - Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Botsford Hospital - Evs 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sagebrook SN Health Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Accredo Health Group, Inc. Orlando FL 748 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAP Henderson, NV 748 FTE
NAT-SIZE Soulshine Farms LLC 748 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pilgrims Pride Corp 748 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.