Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) · California

Douglas Young Family Center

San Diego, CA · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Douglas Young Family Center runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) workplace, earning a grade A.

Douglas Young Family Center: 1.6 TCR = 41% of Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Douglas Young Family Center safety composite

Douglas Young Family Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Douglas Young Family Center held a steady TCR band

Douglas Young Family Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621330 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.6 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #3/38
  • PHOTO Bayview-Montlimar
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bayview-Montlimar (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Douglas Young Family Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Douglas Young Family Center averages 1.6 TCR (41% of the Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Douglas Young Family Center TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Douglas Young Family Center falls in its industry

137 Social workers' , mental healt establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 38 Social workers' , mental healt employers in California.

Douglas Young Family Center (28 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Douglas Young Family Center
Douglas Young Family Center (28 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Douglas Young Family Center has fewer employees than the Social workers' , mental health, offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.9 4.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621330 · CA · San Diego

137 Social workers' , mental health, offices (e.g., centers, clinics) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bayview-Montlimar 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baldwin Park FRC 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jane Westin 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Guilford County Department of Social Services - Greensboro 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR 95 - Olentangy 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Winchester Industrial Controls, LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 545 - Steeplechase 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 568 - Wilkesboro 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westby Headquarters 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE R & C Fence, Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1411 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 1037 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.