Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation · North Carolina

Dover Insulation, Inc.

Marion, NC · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dover Insulation, Inc. runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation workplace, earning a grade B.

Dover Insulation, Inc.: 1.6 TCR = 57% of Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dover Insulation, Inc. safety composite

Dover Insulation, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dover Insulation, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Dover Insulation, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Marion, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/35
  • PHOTO TK Elevator Little R…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TK Elevator Little Rock (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Dover Insulation, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dover Insulation, Inc. averages 1.6 TCR (57% of the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dover Insulation, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=9.6 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Dover Insulation, Inc. falls in its industry

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and p establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 35 Insulation, boiler, duct and p employers in North Carolina.

Dover Insulation, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Dover Insulation, Inc.
Dover Insulation, Inc. (21 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Dover Insulation, Inc. has fewer employees than the Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, insta median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.6 0.0 2 0 1
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · NC · Marion

1,138 Insulation, boiler, duct and pipe, installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 49 employers in Marion, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Little Rock 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Milwaukee 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Quality Services 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Timothy Yarbrough 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty NC Breeders 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE NCJA1-SEL-JASON 1' 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunburst Trout Farms 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR North Cove, NC 2,895 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baxter, North Cove, NC, USA - MFG 2,475 FTE
CITY-NEAR MH Mission Hospital McDowell, LLLP 492 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coats North America - Sevier Plant 376 FTE
NAT-TCR Electric Conduit Construction Company 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Monogram Appetizers, LLC - PR 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Electric Motor Sales (Pc1023) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR First Student 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Akron Bearing Co., Inc. 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plasticycle 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eventworks Jacksonville 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Roberts Tool & Die Company 401 Industrial Road 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.