Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair · Wisconsin

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay

Kaukana, WI · ~52 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair workplace, earning a grade B.

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay: 1.6 TCR = 57% of Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay safety composite

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2022

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay injury rate improved

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238290 · Kaukana, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/38
  • PHOTO TK Elevator Little R…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TK Elevator Little Rock (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay averages 1.6 TCR (57% of the Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay falls in its industry

1,138 Elevator/Escalator-Installatio establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 38 Elevator/Escalator-Installatio employers in Wisconsin.

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay (52 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay
Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay (52 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Otis Elevator Company-Green Bay has more employees than the Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Moderni median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 - - 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2016 2.6 2.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238290 · WI · Kaukana

1,138 Elevator/Escalator-Installation, Modernization, Maintenance, Service, and Repair employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TK Elevator Little Rock 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Milwaukee 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dover Insulation, Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Total Quality Services 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABS Dekorra 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milk Source, LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greenfire Management Services, LLC 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hoffman Planning, Design & Construction Inc 52 FTE
NAT-TCR MCRT Corpus 1 Tenant LLC 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1101 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Olympia Food Industries, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Jackson 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Atascadero Pet Hospital and Emergency Center 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&M Farms of South Florida, LLC-Labelle 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #0689 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #1493 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.