Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture · Minnesota

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN

Olivia, MN · ~40 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture workplace, earning a grade C.

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN safety composite

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN held a steady TCR band

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541711 · Olivia, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/4
  • PHOTO GSK/ViiV- Durham
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GSK/ViiV- Durham (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN falls in its industry

189 Biotechnology research and dev establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 4 Biotechnology research and dev employers in Minnesota.

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN (40 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN
Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN (40 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 296 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Dow AgroSciences Field R&D Olivia, MN has fewer employees than the Biotechnology research and development l median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541711 · MN · Olivia

189 Biotechnology research and development laboratories or services in agriculture employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 14 employers in Olivia, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GSK/ViiV- Durham 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC. 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Flavors and Fragrances 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo Fisher Scientific 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE FDML TW Shop - SE 0010 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sleepy Eye Feedmill 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forsman Farms HL 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Perham Breeders 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Renville County 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Olivia Hospital and Clinics 165 FTE
CITY-NEAR RC Hospital 161 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1550 OLIVIA HOSPITAL 141 FTE
NAT-TCR Portsmouth NNSY Commissary 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus Health and Rehab 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR GeoCare, Inc. DBA Home Instead Senior Care 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stericycle Environmental Solutions - Houston,TX-4050 Homestead 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATL 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southern Folger Detention Equioment Company - Construction Division 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE GraphTec 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.