Cottage construction general contractors · Maryland

DPR Construction - Maryland

Columbia, MD · ~108 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DPR Construction - Maryland runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cottage construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

DPR Construction - Maryland: 2.2 TCR = 57% of Cottage construction general contractors BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DPR Construction - Maryland safety composite

DPR Construction - Maryland scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2018→2024

DPR Construction - Maryland injury rate improved

DPR Construction - Maryland's TCR fell 0.7 from 1.7 in 2018 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=1.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236115 · Columbia, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.2 · 57% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #7/14
  • PHOTO S.R. Freeman Inc
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: S.R. Freeman Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

DPR Construction - Maryland in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DPR Construction - Maryland averages 2.2 TCR (57% of the Cottage construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DPR Construction - Maryland TCR series: 2018=1.7 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=7.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.8

Where DPR Construction - Maryland falls in its industry

976 Cottage construction general c establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 14 Cottage construction general c employers in Maryland.

DPR Construction - Maryland (108 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate DPR Construction - Maryland
DPR Construction - Maryland (108 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 3.5

DPR Construction - Maryland has more employees than the Cottage construction general contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2023 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2022 2.1 0.7 3 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.3 5.5 8 0 0
2019 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 1.7 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236115 · MD · Columbia

976 Cottage construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 179 employers in Columbia, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR S.R. Freeman Inc 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RAH Southern California Division Office/Home Gallery 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CC Devco LLC 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR POR-DWH-PORTLAND 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Headquarters Building 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lighting Maintenance Inc 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE O'Connor Plumbing 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Accurate Insulation Upper Marlboro 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Howard County General Hospital 1,952 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate HQ 712 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuVasive Clinical Services Monitoring, Inc 621 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuVasive Clinical Services Monitoring Inc - Columbia 586 FTE
NAT-TCR All-Tag Corporation 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Excel Garden - Ontario 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR H.J. Faust, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Quikserv Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE DSM Raw 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Nazareth Resident Dining 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Empire Building Diagnostics 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orion Industries, LTD 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.