Commercial building construction general contractors · Florida

DPR Construction - Tampa

Tampa, FL · ~162 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DPR Construction - Tampa runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

DPR Construction - Tampa: 2.6 TCR = 91% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DPR Construction - Tampa safety composite

DPR Construction - Tampa scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

DPR Construction - Tampa: 1.6 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 4.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2024

DPR Construction - Tampa's TCR rose 1.3 from 1.6 in 2018 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.8 DART
  • RANK #150/218
  • PHOTO Hausmann Constructio…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hausmann Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

DPR Construction - Tampa in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DPR Construction - Tampa averages 2.6 TCR (91% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DPR Construction - Tampa TCR series: 2018=1.6 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 2.9

Where DPR Construction - Tampa falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 218 Commercial building constructi employers in Florida.

DPR Construction - Tampa (162 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate DPR Construction - Tampa
DPR Construction - Tampa (162 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

DPR Construction - Tampa has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 1.8 5 0 0
2023 3.0 1.2 5 0 0
2022 2.4 1.8 4 0 0
2021 4.4 3.2 7 0 0
2020 2.9 2.3 5 0 0
2019 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2018 1.6 0.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · FL · Tampa

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hausmann Construction Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redbuilt -Chino 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles E. Thomas Company 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGA Builders, LLC 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Johnson Davis Inc 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duval Asphalt Products, Inc. 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acousti Engineering Jacksonville 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation Hurlburt Field FL-Bennett Ave (3826) 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR MSY 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Kls Stryker Nj Rdc 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Steward Holy Family Hospital a 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Social Vocational Services 264 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE DPR Construction - Charlotte 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE AGS South 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marriott Seatac 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Moving & Storage 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.