Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) · California

Redbuilt -Chino

Chino, CA · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redbuilt -Chino runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) workplace, earning a grade C.

Redbuilt -Chino: 2.6 TCR = 91% of Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redbuilt -Chino safety composite

Redbuilt -Chino scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Redbuilt -Chino held a steady TCR band

Redbuilt -Chino's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=6.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Chino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 91% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #256/486
  • PHOTO Hausmann Constructio…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hausmann Construction Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Redbuilt -Chino in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redbuilt -Chino averages 2.6 TCR (91% of the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redbuilt -Chino TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=6.8 · 2020=6.6 · 2023=2.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Redbuilt -Chino falls in its industry

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #256 safest of 486 Warehouse construction (e.g., employers in California.

Redbuilt -Chino (36 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Redbuilt -Chino
Redbuilt -Chino (36 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Redbuilt -Chino has fewer employees than the Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 6.6 0.0 2 0 0
2019 6.8 3.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · CA · Chino

4,692 Warehouse construction (e.g., commercial, industrial, manufacturing, private) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 268 employers in Chino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hausmann Construction Inc 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charles E. Thomas Company 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DPR Construction - Tampa 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGA Builders, LLC 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE River Garden Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knight Farms 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE J.H. MEEK & SONS INC. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dirt Farmer and Company 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4078 2,902 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8103 2,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4078 1,732 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Institution for Men 1,680 FTE
NAT-TCR A.T. Still University of Health Sciences - AZ Campus 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Morgan Lumber Co., Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR M.W. Morss Roofing, Inc. 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR NOW Foods - Bloomingdale 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tamer 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 087 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 061 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Altoona 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.