Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Louisiana

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center

Geismar, LA · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center: 0.7 TCR = 31% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center safety composite

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2018→2024

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center injury rate improved

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center's TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.3 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Geismar, LA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/60
  • PHOTO DOMTAR
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DOMTAR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center averages 0.7 TCR (31% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center TCR series: 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 60 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Louisiana.

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center (35 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center
Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center (35 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center has fewer employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · LA · Geismar

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 127 employers in Geismar, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DOMTAR 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR STS Operating - Houston 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Power Products Inc. (Denver) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Halyard Corporation 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Entergy Fossil Generation, Waterford 1&2 Plant 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Heron 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE NOLA 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmisano Construction LLC 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR BASF 1,212 FTE
CITY-NEAR BASF - Geismar 1,143 FTE
CITY-NEAR Brock Services Geismar LA 936 FTE
CITY-NEAR Turner at Shell Chemical LP Geismar LA 674 FTE
NAT-TCR 674 - North New Jersey 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Kokomo Transmission Plant 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Center Line PDC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corteva_Woodland_WDL4 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Better Way Products Lebanon 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Social Vocational Services #339 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charleston SC IW Plant 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Pet - Aurora 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.