Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services · Texas

STS Operating - Houston

Houston, TX · ~51 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

STS Operating - Houston runs at 31% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

STS Operating - Houston: 0.7 TCR = 31% of Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

STS Operating - Houston safety composite

STS Operating - Houston scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

STS Operating - Houston held a steady TCR band

STS Operating - Houston's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 5.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 31% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #25/292
  • PHOTO DOMTAR
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DOMTAR (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

STS Operating - Houston in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows STS Operating - Houston averages 0.7 TCR (31% of the Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

STS Operating - Houston TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.1

Where STS Operating - Houston falls in its industry

2,560 Industrial equipment and machi establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 292 Industrial equipment and machi employers in Texas.

STS Operating - Houston (51 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate STS Operating - Houston
STS Operating - Houston (51 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

STS Operating - Houston has more employees than the Industrial equipment and machinery repai median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 5.3 0.0 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · TX · Houston

2,560 Industrial equipment and machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DOMTAR 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Power Products Inc. (Denver) 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dresser-Rand Geismar Service Center 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Halyard Corporation 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Moore County Gin 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goldsmith 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Titan Directional Drilling 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Flow Liquid Measurement, Inc. 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Hawaii Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Blythe Energy Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Joseph C. Woodard Printing Company 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Human Resources 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE BERWICK 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Arizona League Angels Minor League Facility - Players 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Watkins Roofing, Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Uptown Whittier 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.