Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing · Florida

DRS Network and Imaging Systems

Melbourne, FL · ~1,024 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DRS Network and Imaging Systems runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

DRS Network and Imaging Systems: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DRS Network and Imaging Systems safety composite

DRS Network and Imaging Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2020

DRS Network and Imaging Systems injury rate improved

DRS Network and Imaging Systems's TCR fell 0.5 from 1.1 in 2016 to 0.6 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.1 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.1 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333314 · Melbourne, FL AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #2/5
  • PHOTO NJ101 VISION RESEARCH
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~1,024 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NJ101 VISION RESEARCH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

DRS Network and Imaging Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DRS Network and Imaging Systems averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DRS Network and Imaging Systems TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.7 · 2020=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where DRS Network and Imaging Systems falls in its industry

145 Gun sighting and fire control establishments

Safer than 84% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 5 Gun sighting and fire control employers in Florida.

DRS Network and Imaging Systems (1,024 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate DRS Network and Imaging Systems
DRS Network and Imaging Systems (1,024 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 1.8

DRS Network and Imaging Systems has more employees than the Gun sighting and fire control equipment median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.6 0.4 7 0 0
2019 0.7 0.4 7 0 0
2018 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2016 1.1 0.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333314 · FL · Melbourne

145 Gun sighting and fire control equipment and instruments, optical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 305 employers in Melbourne, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NJ101 VISION RESEARCH 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockwell Collins Optronics Inc 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cabot Microelectronics Corporation - QED 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Barrington 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE BRADENTON FL (TROP) 1,023 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dadeland 776 1,023 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4701-419 1,023 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ocean Reef Club 1,022 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGAS-A458 4,719 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLMES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2,725 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nextech HVACR 2,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health First Medical Group 1,787 FTE
NAT-TCR Boc (Bsa) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Medspeed Fairfax 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Pittsburgh PT 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Webster Hill 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Powell Industries 1,024 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nevada Restaurant Services Inc. dba Dotty's 1,024 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Packaging - Pine Bluff 1,024 FTE
NAT-SIZE Therma LLC 1,024 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.