Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area · California

DRYCO

Fremont, CA · ~318 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DRYCO runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area workplace, earning a grade B.

DRYCO: 2.0 TCR = 71% of Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DRYCO safety composite

DRYCO scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2017→2024

DRYCO injury rate improved

DRYCO's TCR fell 3.2 from 4.4 in 2017 to 1.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 4.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Fremont, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #61/171
  • PHOTO Corland Construction…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~318 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Corland Construction, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

DRYCO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DRYCO averages 2.0 TCR (71% of the Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DRYCO TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=1.9 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=3.4 · 2023=1.3 · 2024=1.2 · BLS 2.8

Where DRYCO falls in its industry

1,634 Asphalting, residential and co establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #61 safest of 171 Asphalting, residential and co employers in California.

DRYCO (318 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate DRYCO
DRYCO (318 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

DRYCO has more employees than the Asphalting, residential and commercial d median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.2 0.6 4 0 0
2023 1.3 0.3 4 0 0
2022 3.4 0.9 11 0 0
2021 1.7 1.0 5 0 0
2020 1.9 0.0 5 0 0
2019 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2018 1.3 0.8 3 0 0
2017 4.4 4.4 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Fremont

1,634 Asphalting, residential and commercial driveway and parking area employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 348 employers in Fremont, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Corland Construction, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tampa Branch 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ergon Construction Group, Inc. - ISO Services Newell 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP-BPT 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grimmius Cattle Company, Inc. - Home Ranch 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alston Construction Company, Inc. 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doty Bros. Equipment Co. 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Dutra Group 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-45500 Fremont Blvd 21,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 517 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lam Research Corp. Fremont Campus 2,887 FTE
NAT-TCR King Printing Company Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Connors State College 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dayton Terminal 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Austin Public Schools ISD#492-Ellis Middle School 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE TPI Ponce 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE Auxiliary Services Corporation of Suny Cortland 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delaney Creek 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE Scottsbluff Nebraska Facility 318 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.