Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

DuBois Village

Dubois, PA · ~73 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

DuBois Village runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

DuBois Village: 15.1 TCR = 398% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

DuBois Village safety composite

DuBois Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2024

DuBois Village injury rate improved

DuBois Village's TCR fell 6.7 from 10.5 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 37.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.5 · 2017=17.4 · 2018=12.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=34.9 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=37.4 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=3.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Dubois, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 398% of ind

  • DART 3.8 DART
  • RANK #207/233
  • PHOTO Brookdale Arvada
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Arvada (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

DuBois Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows DuBois Village averages 15.1 TCR (398% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

DuBois Village TCR series: 2016=10.5 · 2017=17.4 · 2018=12.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=34.9 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=37.4 · 2023=16.4 · 2024=3.8 · BLS 3.8

Where DuBois Village falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #207 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

DuBois Village (73 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate DuBois Village
DuBois Village (73 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

DuBois Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.8 3.8 2 0 0
2023 16.4 16.4 0 8 0
2022 37.4 37.4 5 14 0
2021 1.9 0.0 0 1 0
2020 34.9 34.9 2 17 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 12.1 6.9 7 0 0
2017 17.4 12.2 8 2 0
2016 10.5 3.5 5 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Dubois

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 51 employers in Dubois, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Arvada 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Park Creek Senior Living Community 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tuscany at McCormick Ranch 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEL-Life at Alta 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Highlands DuBois (West) 1,431 FTE
CITY-NEAR DuBois West Campus 1,120 FTE
CITY-NEAR Christ the King Manor Inc. 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR NOVO Health Services--DuBois 282 FTE
NAT-TCR ISC - Youngstown, OH 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR LLM Delivery, LLC 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR First In Cargo 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR BDRFL-Edgewater 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mayco Hartford City 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield Striping & Sealing 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peck Hannaford Briggs Service 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson Contracting Company 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.