Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Park Creek Senior Living Community

Williamsville, NY · ~78 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Creek Senior Living Community runs at 398% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Park Creek Senior Living Community: 15.1 TCR = 398% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Creek Senior Living Community safety composite

Park Creek Senior Living Community scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 38.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Park Creek Senior Living Community: 10.6 → 54.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 54.7 TCR · DART/TCR 3.49× in 2022

Park Creek Senior Living Community's TCR rose 44.0 from 10.6 in 2018 to 54.7 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 3.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Williamsville, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.1 · 398% of ind

  • DART 52.7 DART
  • RANK #263/283
  • PHOTO DuBois Village
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DuBois Village (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Park Creek Senior Living Community in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Creek Senior Living Community averages 15.1 TCR (398% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Creek Senior Living Community TCR series: 2018=10.6 · 2019=7.8 · 2020=3.7 · 2021=38.4 · 2022=54.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Park Creek Senior Living Community falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #263 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Park Creek Senior Living Community (78 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Creek Senior Living Community
Park Creek Senior Living Community (78 employees, TCR 15.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Park Creek Senior Living Community has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 54.7 52.7 1 27 0
2021 38.4 38.4 0 18 0
2020 3.7 1.8 2 0 0
2019 7.8 5.8 4 0 0
2018 10.6 6.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Williamsville

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 98 employers in Williamsville, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DuBois Village 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Arvada 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tuscany at McCormick Ranch 15.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEL-Life at Alta 15.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Key Capture Energy, LLC 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Branch Restoration 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skanska USA Commercial Development 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&H Excavating Inc 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR People Inc. 3,823 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingram Micro, Inc. - Williamsville 1,555 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingram Micro Corporate East 1,507 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Transit Road 090 515 FTE
NAT-TCR 306657-Oma-South Omaha Sta 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Costa View Farms 2 (Madera) 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-AHSCM17 15.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0019-0019-01762 15.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Miller's Health Systems 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE AeroGen-TEK 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHS - Dickson Hollow 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHS - Kirkland Crossings 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.